Editor's note: The Hastings Journal invited all candidates in the races featured in this voter guide to answer questions about issues affecting Hastings and the surrounding communities. Candidates in each race received identical questions and were given a deadline of 3 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 18, to respond.
To provide every candidate with an opportunity to participate, the Journal extended the response window and accepted additional submissions before the newspaper went to press. Candidates who did not respond by publication time are identified in their respective races.
This online voter guide includes all six questions asked of the candidates in each race and all responses received. The print edition featured a selection of questions because of space limitations. All candidate responses are published as submitted, without editing for content, spelling or grammar. Candidates were asked to limit their responses to 150 words per question.
The publication of these questions and any paid political ads do not represent any endorsement of any candidates by the Hastings Journal.
Minnesota State Senate, District 41
Candidates: Judy Seeberger (DFL) and Tom Dippel (Republican)
Both candidates responded to the Hastings Journal's questionnaire.
Candidate biographies
Judy Seeberger (DFL)
No candidate biography was submitted.
Tom Dippel (Republican)
As a lifelong resident of the district, I am running to serve and sacrifice for the community I grew up in and love. I've been married to my wife, Carrie, for over 18 years. We have 6 children, I'm an 18 year business owner and the board chair of Valor Classical Academy, a school I helped found that is also located in the district.
Elected to the Minnesota House in 2024, I represent District 41B and serve on education and health committees. During my first term, I helped secure $17.5 million for Hastings' drinking water treatment and $9.6 million for a Cottage Grove road and bridge improvement.
I am running for Minnesota Senate to advocate for excellent schools, lower costs, to right size government back to levels that allowed our state to thrive and to make sure your tax dollars are spent wisely. I humbly ask for your vote to continue serving the community I love.
Question 1
Hastings faces significant costs to construct three water treatment plants because of PFAS contamination. What additional state funding or action would you pursue to protect drinking water while reducing costs for residents?
Judy Seeberger:
I am proud of the work I have done to secure funding for the Hastings Water Treatment plant construction, and was thrilled to deliver $17.4M in bonding dollars to Hastings in 2026 for the treatment plant. I also delivered $5M from the new Emerging Contaminants Fund, and with my help, Hastings was able to qualify for over $12M in 3M settlement funds. I authored a bill taxing PFAS polluters with the revenue to go toward PFAS clean-up and mitigation, and I will continue to hold polluters accountable since they should be the ones bearing the cost of the clean-up - not the residents of Hastings. I have also authored Amara's Law which contains the strictest bans on intentionally-added PFAS in consumer products in the nation. I have been a leader for clean water, and will continue to do so when I return to the Senate.
Tom Dippel:
Delivering clean water funding to Hastings was one of my campaign promises when I ran for House and I delivered on that promise. Clean drinking water is a basic responsibility of government, and Hastings residents should not have to shoulder the cost of contamination they did not cause. This session, I worked with local leaders and legislators on both sides of the aisle to help secure $17.5 million for the Eastern Water Treatment Plant so Hastings residents water bills didn't skyrocket and we have clean water to drink. I also chief authored bills that are outside the box to keep funding flowing to Hastings for this issue. That includes money from the Clean Water Legacy fund - a fund that has a mandate to utilize at least 5% of its balance to help Minnesotans with clean drinking water.
Question 2
Rising grocery, gasoline, housing and utility costs are affecting local families. What state policies would you support to make everyday life more affordable?
Tom Dippel:
As a father of six and small business owner, I understand how rising costs affect family budgets and businesses alike.
During my first term, I helped pass property tax relief and car tab fee reductions that Minnesotans will see next year. But we need to do more.
I would start by reversing and eliminating the massive gas tax increase my opponent passed as the deciding vote when she promised not to. Not only was the tax increased, but it was also tied to inflation which has caused even higher increases in gas prices here in Minnesota. Our groceries directly cost more because it cost more to harvest and transport them due to this tax increase. Dakota County just recently announced property taxes will be increasing about 18.5% over the next 2 years. They cited one of the main contributing factors as being the mandates my opponent passed on to the counties, but did not fully fund. I would fight to shift our state budget back to levels seen just 5 years ago, when our state was more affordable. Minnesotans cannot afford the massive, record breaking 40% state budget increase that occurred 3 and 4 years ago. The average house costs $20,000-40,000 less just across the border in Wisconsin. We need to right-size government and regulations so our state can thrive once again.
Judy Seeberger:
I support property tax relief for all Minnesotans, but especially for our seniors. In addition, in 2023, I was able to exempt most Minnesotans from paying tax on their Social Security Benefits, and will continue to fight for a full exemption for everyone. I have also worked hard on housing issues and have gone after private equity companies who subject residents to predatory housing practices - particularly in our senior housing and in manufactured housing communities. We have a crisis in Minnesota when it comes to affordable housing. My work has focused on ensuring that no one gets priced out of their home and that we continue to maintain true affordable housing in Minnesota.
Question 3
What changes to state education funding or policy would you support to help districts such as ISD 200 maintain quality education while protecting taxpayers?
Judy Seeberger:
As a licensed public school teacher in the State of Minnesota, I know what it takes to give students a strong education. I support state funding that keeps pace with inflation and a larger state share of special education costs, so districts such as ISD 200 can protect classroom instruction without relying as heavily on local property taxes. New state requirements should come with funding and realistic implementation timelines. I would also support teacher retention, career and technical education, and student mental health services. Taxpayers deserve clear budgets, transparent spending, and evidence that investments are helping students. I believe in the value of our public schools, and I believe in our teachers.
Tom Dippel:
I believe excellent schools, strong teachers, and responsible spending go hand in hand.
The state needs to adequately fund special education and other mandates instead of shifting those costs onto districts like ISD 200 and local property taxpayers. We should also protect classroom funding, support the READ Act, improve school safety, and give local school boards greater flexibility to make decisions that best serve their students.
As the founder and board chair of Valor Classical Academy and a member of the House Education Finance Committee, I've seen firsthand the importance of strong leadership, dedicated teachers, and parental involvement.
Our focus should be on academic achievement, student well-being, and ensuring education dollars reach classrooms rather than being consumed by unnecessary administrative requirements. We can support excellent education while respecting the taxpayers who fund it.
Question 4
The Highway 61 reconstruction will disrupt local businesses and commuters. What should the state do to minimize those impacts and help businesses survive construction?
Tom Dippel:
Highway 61 is vital to Hastings residents and businesses, and while these improvements are necessary, we must ensure construction doesn't unnecessarily damage our local economy.
MnDOT currently plans to complete the project in stages while maintaining traffic in both directions. I support that approach and believe the state must prioritize maintaining business access, providing clear signage, minimizing unnecessary closures, and communicating regularly with affected businesses and residents.
I'll work with MnDOT, the City of Hastings, and the Hastings Area Chamber of Commerce to ensure local concerns are heard and addressed. We should also explore targeted assistance for small businesses experiencing severe construction-related hardship.
As a business owner myself, I understand how disruptive losing customer access can be. Our goal must be to improve the highway while protecting the businesses that make Hastings a great community.
Judy Seeberger:
This is a major project that I have been following closely. Affected businesses must have a say in the construction plan before the first road closes. I would push MnDOT to coordinate with Hastings and local business owners on phased construction, reliable delivery access, and frequent updates. The plan must also account for commuters, school buses, and emergency vehicles. Working with the Chamber, the state should also support a process that works for business leaders. Improving Highway 61 should leave Hastings with safer roads and a strong local business community.
Question 5
How would you balance protecting Second Amendment rights with preventing people legally prohibited from possessing firearms from obtaining them? What legislation would you support to address firearm-related crime?
Judy Seeberger:
Last year after the Annunciation School shooting, I worked with my colleagues across the aisle to develop a gun violence prevention package that could actually pass a divided legislature. As a gun owner and holder of a permit to carry, I find that the rhetoric around gun ownership does nothing to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them. I support increased penalties for straw purchases, greater ability at the point-of-sale for federally-licensed dealers to identify threats, and greater resources for law enforcement to keep illegally-trafficked guns off the streets. I also support more funding for mental health support, a state-wide "say something" reporting system, and more tools to identify potential shooters before another tragedy occurs.
Tom Dippel:
I support the Second Amendment and the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families. At the same time, people who are legally prohibited from possessing firearms should not be able to obtain them. I believe we should focus on enforcing existing laws and ensuring violent criminals are held accountable. I support providing law enforcement the resources necessary to investigate and prevent firearm-related crimes.
We should also improve access to mental health services and ensure due process protections are respected.
We can take meaningful steps to prevent gun violence without restricting the constitutional rights of responsible gun owners, hunters, and sportsmen.
Unfortunately, this year my opponent voted in committee to severely punish law-abiding Minnesotans. She voted to take away many hunting shotguns and rifles, would have required law abiding Minesotans to obtain a state certification to own them and would have required confiscation and destruction of them if they didn't renew the certification every 3 years.
Question 6
What do you consider the most pressing issue facing District 41 beyond those already discussed, and what specific action would you take to address it?
Tom Dippel:
One of the most pressing issues facing our district and state is restoring accountability and trust in government.
Minnesota has experienced significant fraud and waste involving taxpayer dollars. Every dollar lost is a dollar unavailable for our schools, roads, public safety, and programs helping people who genuinely need assistance.
This session, I chief authored HF 4715, legislation requiring greater transparency and early warning when state program spending significantly exceeds projections. I also voted for establishing a truly independent Office of Inspector General with investigative authority, subpoena powers, and the ability to seek court approval to freeze suspicious payments.
As a business owner, I'm accountable for every dollar spent, and I believe government should operate with that same responsibility.
Minnesotans deserve a government that delivers results, protects taxpayer dollars, and holds those responsible for fraud accountable.
Judy Seeberger:
My priority is restoring trust in government. Voters in District 41 deserve representation that works for them - not just a select few. I have worked hard to foster relationships across the aisle and in the other body during the last 4 years. We all have more in common than we don't, and it is my job to represent everyone in District 41, whether you voted for me or not. I pledge to continue to put people over party and listen to every voice. Next, I will continue to crack down on fraud. Every dollar stolen is a dollar unavailable for our schools, public safety, and other services. I have been fighting fraud since my first day in office, and I will continue to do so. Finally, I will continue to stand for public safety and ensure everyone in District 41 has strong police, fire, and EMS protection.
Minnesota House of Representatives, District 41B
Candidates: Jen Fox (DFL) and William Beck (Republican)
Both candidates submitted responses to the Hastings Journal's questionnaire. Fox's responses were received during the extended response window.
Candidate biographies
Jen Fox (DFL)
Our community deserves reliable representation from someone who knows our district and is committed to bringing our voices to the Capitol.
As a lifelong Hastings resident, I couldn’t imagine a better place to live, work, or raise a family. My decades of involvement in the community, both individually and as a former member of the City Council, has uniquely positioned me with a deep understanding of the issues our district is facing. My Master’s Degree in Public Policy and my small business background has given me the understanding of how to fight for our needs in a bipartisan way to accomplish solutions for our district.
I can’t wait to fight for every corner of our district. To be a voice for all of us, not party politics.
William Beck (Republican)
Our family lives in Hastings, where we are raising our two children. I am not a politician. As an advocate of term limits, I plan to serve no more than two or three terms. I believe fresh perspectives are important in government. My experience comes from my time as a former middle school math teacher, community volunteer, and a Minnesota House intern. I now work as a lab technician. I plan oral surgeries for dental practices across the country, helping average people get their smile back. As a legislator, I want to help the average Minnesotan get their smile back.
Question 1
What state action would you support to help Hastings pay for its three PFAS water treatment plants without placing additional financial burdens on residents?
Jen Fox:
All of district 41B deserves access to clean AND affordable water. Our representatives should be held accountable to create bi-partisan coalitions and partnerships in the legislature to fight for our district. Our legislators should fight together for bonding money to build our clean water resources that do not break legal agreements already in place or that are unconstitutional. We must prioritize our residents' pocketbooks and health first, then we should look at a model to help support clean water access to our townships in this district.
William Beck:
The people of Hastings did not pollute the water. They should not be stuck with the bill for new water treatment facilities. As a legislator, I will pursue all available avenues to fund these projects so water bill increases are kept to a minimum. Possible avenues for funding include allocations from the general fund, bonding, the legacy fund, or even legislation including Hastings as part of the 3M settlement fund. I will of course sign on to any grant requests from the federal government, as well.
Question 2
What legislation would you prioritize to address rising costs for groceries, gasoline, housing and utilities?
William Beck:
There is a nationwide affordability crisis. However, Minnesota stands out compared to neighboring states in that healthcare, childcare, and housing are far more expensive. On top of that, we have one of the highest tax burdens in the nation. As a legislator, I will advocate for fewer burdensome regulations that weigh the supply chain down. Minnesota must adopt streamlined zoning laws so that housing is more affordable. I will also advocate for a gas tax holiday, to offer some temporary relief while gasoline and diesel prices are through the roof.
Jen Fox:
Residents in our district are struggling to pay for childcare and groceries at the same time, our older Minnesotans are struggling with health care decisions, and diesel for farmers is at historical high rates. Frankly, life does not have to be this hard. As your legislator I would prioritize families and small businesses in our community by: fighting price gouging in our grocery stores, right sizing our tax structure so those with the most money don't pay the least, and holding our insurance companies accountable so our residents can afford health care.
Question 3
How would you improve state education funding and accountability to help ISD 200 and other local schools meet student needs?
Jen Fox:
Minnesota's (and Hastings') Public Schools need thoughtful and critical investments now more than ever. That is why every voter should mark their ballot YES to the Constitutional Amendment on the front page of their ballots when they vote. This amendment is a perpetual financial resource for Minnesota school districts without increased taxes. A blank vote is a "no".
Dr. Wehrkamp Herman, works to find the best data possible from our public schools. What we know from the past three years of perception surveys in our district is that our teachers and paraprofessional staff are holding our students up and need support. We can improve teacher pay in order to recruit and retain the best candidates, we can work to expand working conditions for our paraprofessionals and other staff in our district, and we can create pathways to the workforce for our students to create better long term outcomes.
William Beck:
Unfunded mandates passed during the 2023-2024 legislative session have hit our schools hard. I will fight to ensure that any mandates placed on our schools are either funded, modified, or eliminated. Unfunded mandates are not fair for our local schools, as many were already facing large budget shortfalls. My eldest son has Down Syndrome, which has informed my perspective on special education. I will fight to bring back the $250 million in special education funding that was cut as part of a backroom budget deal at the Capitol. As a former teacher (and occasional substitute), I understand education is a critical part of good governance. As a parent of two young children, I understand what’s at stake for the next generation. I will advocate for our students at the Capitol.
Question 4
What state assistance should be available to local businesses affected by major construction projects such as the Highway 61 reconstruction?
William Beck:
Minnesota has the highest business tax in the nation. Some candidates for office have suggested that we increase that tax. I believe that would be a mistake. We must welcome business in Minnesota, especially our local small businesses. Our campaign has been endorsed by the NFIB and the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Leadership Fund.
The Highway 61 project has the potential to jeopardize business on and around the Vermillion corridor. While the state has done a good job meeting with local business owners, I would encourage a continued dialogue throughout the duration of the project. I would support legislation that would offer property tax and business tax rebates to businesses affected by construction. Our campaign will advocate for these small businesses and ensure their voices are heard through the duration of this project.
Jen Fox:
Over 30,000 vehicles traverse the 2.7-mile stretch of Hwy 61 daily, it is critical to enhance this corridor. Since my time on Hastings City Council, the MN Department of Transportation has been collecting input from businesses on this project. Our representative should be responsible for their needs. The State of Minnesota assigns a Business Liaison, marketing resources, and the Small Business Assistance Office (SBAO) as consultants during construction. It is important to connect with those small businesses affected to learn their needs and see how to adapt the resources in place to make up for the deficits.
As a business owner who will be affected by multiple reconstruction projects in the coming years, it is critical that our representatives are present and available to the needs of our local businesses. I have that expertise and want to represent our business needs with the state during this challenge.
Question 5
How would you protect Second Amendment rights while keeping firearms out of the hands of legally prohibited individuals? What changes, if any, would you support to Minnesota's firearm laws?
Jen Fox:
As a student at Hastings Public Schools, I was raised post-Columbine. Me and my classmates were not afraid of tornados or fires... we were afraid of active shooters. Now, my family goes to teach in those public schools where we all had to do "drills" for active shooters where our teachers were trained to charge active shooters to save students. Our nation, including Minnesota, has a gun violence problem.
Gun violence is not a political problem but our career politicians continue to make it so. What I believe we need: current semiautomatic military-style assault weapons must be certified, no more than 17 rounds in a magazine with no double round options, implementation of firearm liability insurance, and mental health gun violence prevention programs.
Our district thrives on hunting and access to recreational weapons. I wouldn’t limit our access to incredible resources, I want to protect our residents from gun violence.
William Beck:
I am a proud gun owner and supporter of the Second Amendment. Law-abiding Minnesotans should not be treated like criminals for exercising it. Recent shootings have inspired a robust conversation around firearms and public safety. We cannot afford to do nothing in the wake of these tragedies. I propose that the legislature should focus on public safety and mental health. We must ensure our courts enforce mandatory minimums for criminals, support our police officers, and give our schools the resources to support student mental health and security. On the latter point, I have told local school officials that I will sponsor the SHIELD Act (HF 15 2025), which gives one-time funding to school districts for additional security.
Question 6
What other issue affecting District 41B would be your highest priority, and how would you address it?
William Beck:
Our campaign is focused on making Minnesota affordable, holding fraudsters accountable, academic excellence in our schools, and securing water treatment funding for our communities. These are all top priorities. The estimated $9 billion in stolen tax dollars was one of the main reasons that I decided to run for office. My son, Teddy, has Down Syndrome. He and countless other Minnesotans do and will rely on these Medicaid-funded programs. Our campaign is focused on protecting these programs from cuts and fraud. We must fire the bureaucrats and investigators that failed to do their jobs, institute strict oversight for these programs, and protect whistleblowers.
Jen Fox:
Candidate did not provide an answer.
Dakota County Commissioner, District 1
Candidates: Nathan Ryan and Mike Slavik, both nonpartisan
Both candidates were invited to participate in the Hastings Journal's questionnaire and received identical questions and deadlines. Mike Slavik submitted his responses. No response had been received from Nathan Ryan by the time this guide was prepared.
Candidate biography
Mike Slavik
Dakota County Commissioner since 2013. Board Chair in 2017, 2020 and 2025. Previously served on the Hastings City Council.
Current Chair of the Vermillion River Watershed, Dakota 911 Board and Past President of the Association of Minnesota Counties (only the 2nd from Dakota County in 118 years!) Represent Dakota County on many local, state and national committees.
Past President of the Hastings YMCA and Hastings High School Alumni Association. Realtor and small business owner.
6th generation resident of District 1 and live in Hastings with wife Maria and daughter who is a 6th grader at Hastings Middle School.
Question 1
How would you prioritize county road improvements and minimize the impact of construction on residents and businesses?
Mike Slavik:
Over the past decade, the county road system has seen a dramatic increase in funding for planned and completed projects. Following the 2040 Dakota County Transportation Plan, projects are prioritized in three main areas: Safety, Condition, and Modernization/Expansion. First and foremost, improvements need to address both vehicle and pedestrian safety. Second, take care of existing roads so they do not further deteriorate. Finally, address congestion and expand capacity.
Road construction is a major inconvenience for those directly impacted, in addition to the general public who use the roads. Completing the work as fast as possible and communicating before, during and after the construction process is key. Over the years, I have seen improvement, but more can be done. Open houses, weekly updates and progress and a tight timeline, particularly with utility companies, can minimize the impact for everyone.
Question 2
How would you control county spending and property taxes while maintaining essential services?
Mike Slavik:
Much of the work of counties is either mandated at the state or federal level. The 2027 budget will be somewhere between 80-85% mandated with many parts unfunded or partially state/federally funded. New shifts and mandates will be more than the Sheriff patrol and 911 budget for District 1. As a result, services residents enjoy like parks and libraries are reduced to maintain the mandated programs.
In the 2026 and proposed 2027 budget, Dakota County will have reduced operations by $21 million and eliminated over 100 positions while prioritizing mandated programs and essential services. These cuts are difficult, but necessary to find balance between essential and desired county services. The county must continue its work both at the state and federally to lessen the mandated shifts and programs or minimally allow greater flexibility to find cost controls. Lastly, it must build back its reserves to best prepare for uncertain times.
Question 3
What county services or issues affecting Hastings and District 1 would be your highest priority, and how would you address them?
Mike Slavik:
The unfunded mandates and shifts from the state and federal government are significant drivers in recent county property tax increases and are not sustainable. I, along with County Commissioners across the state, have been very active to either reduce these mandates or offer flexibility in how the work is done so counties can be more innovative. Other proposals include the State of Minnesota administering parts of social services instead of counties, which is similar to 39 other states.
Additionally, addressing mental health in both children and adults is a top priority. Much of this is not mandated but is a significant issue in Dakota County and the state. Providing more secure beds for individuals in crisis is key, especially for children. Dakota County recently built a 16-bed facility in West St. Paul, but more are needed.
Question 4
How should Dakota County approach data center development while balancing economic benefits, water and energy use, and impacts on surrounding communities?
Mike Slavik:
It is a common misconception that Dakota County has a significant role in potential data centers locating within the county. This is not true, as all cities and townships in Dakota County control their own planning and zoning authority. Additionally, water and energy use is regulated at the state and Metropolitan Council level.
Counties in Minnesota and throughout the country that have enacted data center moratoriums HAVE local planning and zoning authority, which is NOT the case in Dakota County.
In general, though economic development is primarily the role of the cities or townships, the county, through the Dakota County Community Development Agency is a collaborative partner in marketing the entire county for business growth and development.
Question 5
What role should Dakota County play in addressing PFAS contamination, protecting groundwater and supporting communities facing rising water treatment costs?
Mike Slavik:
Clean drinking water throughout all of Dakota County and particularly in District 1, is regularly threatened. PFAS contamination is highest in Hastings and Nininger Township, however nitrates exceed drinking water standards in the eastern half of District 1, while manganese is above standards in parts of the western half of District 1.
Regulation is through the Metropolitan Council or state agencies like the Departments of Agriculture, Health and Natural Resources or the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency because water issues are bigger than an individual city or county. For over 50 years, the county has tested a number of wells in the rural areas.
Recently, the county started testing its wells for PFAS. That data was shared with state agencies. In addition to data and trends, the county has supported bonding and legislation addressing PFAS, nitrates and state support on treatment options for cities and well owners.
Question 6
How would you balance residential and commercial development with preserving farmland and the character of rural communities?
Mike Slavik:
Once again, planning and zoning of new residential and commercial development occurs at the city and township level and not at the county level throughout Dakota County.
Dakota County is 1/3 urban, 1/3 suburban and 1/3 rural. Protecting and preserving farmland and open spaces in Dakota County is personally very important to me and the current Dakota County Board of Commissioners. In 2022, the county adopted a natural resource and open spaces plan that identifies high quality spaces and farmland that should be protected from development. Though the county does not have any regulatory authority over new development, it continues to leverage state, federal and non-profit dollars to protect farmland and open spaces. Since 2002, Dakota County has permanently protected thousands of acres of farmland and open spaces!
Dakota County Sheriff
Candidates: Bobby Lambert and Joe Leko, both nonpartisan
Both candidates responded to the Hastings Journal's questionnaire.
Candidate biographies
Bobby Lambert
I started my law enforcement career in 1996 with the Mendota Heights Police Department. I’ve spent the majority of my career teaching law enforcement officers in a variety of disciplines with a heavy emphasis on use of force. I spent fifteen years on our county-wide SWAT team, nine as a supervisor, retiring from the team as its Team Commander. I spent six years with the Farmington Police Department before accepting a lateral promotion to sergeant with the Dakota County Sheriff’s Office. I’ve served as a sergeant in patrol, transport, and court security, while overseeing our use of force program.
Joe Leko
Joe Leko is the 21st Sheriff of Dakota County and a lifelong county resident. He has dedicated nearly 30 years to the Dakota County Sheriff’s Office, including 20 years in leadership roles as Sergeant, Captain, Chief Deputy, and Sheriff. He holds a Master’s degree in Public Safety and Law Enforcement Leadership and is a graduate of the FBI National Academy. Leko serves as Vice President of the Minnesota Sheriffs’ Association and on several statewide public safety leadership boards. His leadership emphasizes accountability, integrity, innovation, fiscal responsibility, and a commitment to public trust and community safety.
Question 1
What do you consider the greatest public safety challenges facing Dakota County, and how would you address them?
Bobby Lambert:
Since 2023, twenty-five licensed deputies have left the Sheriff’s Office, including a former Commander, a Captain, and three Sergeants. That number doesn't include retirees. Our non-sworn deputies have experienced similar turnover during that time. As Sheriff, I will address the ongoing issue that has handicapped our mission in providing the highest level of services to our communities. We know that employees who feel valued and respected experience higher job satisfaction, improved mental health, and stronger motivation to perform their best. And the organization experiences lower turnover, more productivity, and a stronger culture of communication and collaboration. I will disband the autocratic leadership we’re currently under and incorporate a diplomatic leadership based on support, development, accountability, and empowerment.
By changing the culture within the sheriff’s office, our retention and recruitment issues will be resolved. I’ll then focus on the mental health and training challenges I’ve spoken about throughout my campaign.
Joe Leko:
Dakota County faces significant public safety challenges, including illegal drugs and overdoses, domestic and sexual violence, mental health crises, traffic safety, and increasingly sophisticated financial scams. These issues impact all of us, directly or indirectly, affecting individuals, families, and the safety of our communities. As your Sheriff, I have seen the impact of these challenges firsthand.
My approach is comprehensive: enforcement, prevention, education, treatment, and partnerships. We must hold offenders accountable while addressing the underlying factors contributing to crime. I will continue strengthening investigative capabilities, supporting victims, investing in training and technology, and collaborating with our 11 municipal police agencies and regional partners. Public safety challenges continue to evolve. Meeting them requires experience, innovation, accountability, and leadership that delivers results. I have demonstrated these qualities throughout my career and will continue doing so as Sheriff.
Question 2
Following the county's Flock camera pilot program, what role should automated license plate readers have in law enforcement, and how would you protect residents' privacy?
Joe Leko:
Technology can be a valuable tool in law enforcement, but its use must be balanced with effectiveness, individual privacy, constitutional rights, and public trust. Following a missing person case, we implemented a limited pilot of eight automated license plate readers in our rural patrol area. The technology assisted investigations and making arrests, demonstrating its value. However, concerns about privacy, data sharing, public trust, and limited returns led me to suspend the program.
I view this technology as valuable to public safety, but believe it's important that the public supports how collected data is used, stored, accessed, and shared. Any future consideration must include community input, clear policies governing appropriate use, strict data retention and access controls, auditing, and transparency. I've demonstrated a willingness to make difficult decisions and change course when necessary. Technology should enhance public safety while maintaining constitutional protections, transparency, and the trust of those we serve.
Bobby Lambert:
Flock cameras can be a vital tool for law enforcement to identify and locate unlicensed drivers, stolen vehicles, stolen license plates, missing persons, vulnerable adults, abductions, wanted persons, KOPS (Keeping Our Police Safe) Alerts, Amber Alerts, and individuals who are in crisis.
We’ve been here before. In 2013, there were several reports of law enforcement personnel misusing the Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) database. Multiple investigations revealed officers using the DVS database improperly to look up personal records, photographs, and addresses of citizens, public figures, or female colleagues. This led to federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) lawsuits and multi-thousand/million-dollar settlements or verdicts. However, thirteen years later, we still utilize that resource. It was not scrapped. Enhanced protections, including Multi-factor authentication, bolstered monitoring, and tougher penalties, were implemented and enforced. Law enforcement and the public understood the value of the database. I support a similar approach to Flock and other Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPR). Like the DVS database, ALPRs are too valuable to abandon because of their impact on public safety.
Question 3
What changes would you make to staffing, training or operations within the Dakota County Sheriff's Office?
Bobby Lambert:
I will re-evaluate all office divisions’ staffing and determine what, if anything, we should change. I will address our staff shortage as mentioned earlier and rehire some of the quality employees we’ve lost over the past four years to other agencies. As Sheriff, I will establish a full-time Training Unit to ensure that our sheriff’s office employees receive the best training. Currently, our instructors and field training officers perform those duties as a supplemental assignment, meaning their primary job duty is not training. The supervisors tasked with managing those duties also have primary job functions outside of training. With this full-time unit, tragic mistakes like the 2024 in-custody death within our jail don’t happen again. My administration will be composed of highly competent, high-character, people-oriented men and women leaders who can effectively manage and communicate our sheriff’s office mission. These changes will get our office moving in the right direction.
Joe Leko:
Under my leadership, we've strengthened our workforce through improved compensation, employee wellness, training, and equipment, achieving nearly full staffing and strong retention. I've expanded patrol staffing, strengthened investigative capabilities, improved jail operations, and enhanced training to address evolving public safety challenges. Our shared values of integrity, respect, accountability, and professionalism guide our work.
Moving forward, I'll continue developing future leaders, advancing specialized training, and pursuing professional accreditation. With over 200 employees and a $36 million budget, we've consistently operated within budget while improving services.
I don't believe in maintaining the status quo. My nearly three decades of service, 20 years in leadership, deep institutional knowledge, and proven record of results have prepared me to make informed decisions and lead through difficult challenges. Sound judgment and executive leadership experience develop over time and are tested through real-world decisions. This experience serves Dakota County well and prepares us for emerging threats.
Question 4
How would you balance enforcement of firearm laws and public safety with protecting the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens?
Joe Leko:
Protecting constitutional rights and maintaining public safety are not competing responsibilities. As Sheriff, I have an obligation to uphold both. I strongly support the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens while recognizing our responsibility to enforce existing firearm laws and protect our communities from violent crime. Our enforcement efforts must focus on individuals who illegally possess firearms, use them to commit crimes, or pose credible threats to themselves or others.
We must aggressively investigate gun violence and remove firearms from those prohibited from possessing them. Domestic violence requires early intervention, working with our partners to identify threats before violence occurs. I oversee permits to carry, ensuring compliance with Minnesota and federal law. I also emphasize firearm safety, secure storage, and responsible ownership. I will remain engaged in legislative discussions supporting public safety and constitutional rights. My oath to uphold the Constitution guides these responsibilities and decisions.
Bobby Lambert:
I’ll always support responsible gun owners’ rights to own and carry legally. We’ve made some progress in addressing firearms being used by persons who should not have possession of them. In January 2024, the Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) law went into effect. Also known as the Red Flag law, it is a good step in safeguarding lives by allowing courts to temporarily restrict firearm possession and purchase for individuals who pose a significant danger to themselves or others. Law enforcement officers, city or county attorneys, family or household members, and guardians can all file a petition request. These orders can be immediate (Emergency) and last 14 days, or Long-term pending a court hearing and can last 6-12 months. This issue still requires a multi-layered approach. Tougher penalties for violators and those who knowingly provide firearms to a restricted person will help as well.
Question 5
How would you address mental health crises, substance abuse and repeat offenders while maintaining public safety?
Bobby Lambert:
The correlation between substance abuse and mental health is alarming. Mental health is one of the most concerning issues in our communities because it affects everyone. We all deal with it to varying degrees, and not everyone has the support and resources available to manage their mental health. Our office currently has two licensed deputies who’ve taken it upon themselves to obtain advanced training in mental health. As Sheriff, I will establish a dedicated, full-time Mental Health Unit composed of both sworn and non-sworn deputies whose primary focus will be to address mental health concerns within our communities and detention centers. The unit will build stronger relationships with those in need of services, their support systems, our mental health partners (ie: Dakota County Crisis), and other stakeholders. The unit’s secondary focus will be on providing support to our sheriff’s office employees and their families. This issue deserves a full-time response.
Joe Leko:
Under my leadership, we've expanded mental health co-response, strengthened partnerships with social services, advanced crisis intervention training through our SMART Center, and prioritized employee mental health and wellness. In 2025, we opened Minnesota's first-of-its-kind 26-bed Integrative Health Unit in our jail, providing specialized care for individuals experiencing mental health crises, substance use disorders, and significant medical needs.
Public safety requires accountability while addressing the underlying factors contributing to criminal behavior. We must distinguish between individuals who need treatment and those who repeatedly victimize our communities. Those trafficking dangerous drugs must be held accountable. For individuals struggling with substance use disorders and addiction, treatment and diversion are appropriate in some circumstances, while enforcement and incarceration remain necessary for dangerous offenders. Our approach includes early intervention, treatment, effective reentry services, and collaboration with courts and community partners to reduce repeat offenses and protect our communities.
Question 6
How would you improve transparency, accountability and cooperation between the Sheriff's Office and local police departments?
Joe Leko:
Transparency, accountability, and strong partnerships are essential to effective law enforcement and public trust. Under my leadership, we've expanded transparency through our Sheriff's Office website, mobile app, media appearances, and launch of our Raising the Bar podcast, providing greater public access to information about our operations, policies, and public safety issues. We're also pursuing professional accreditation to strengthen accountability and continuous improvement.
We maintain strong relationships with our 11 municipal police departments through joint partnerships, sharing resources and coordinating responses to public safety challenges. I meet regularly with police chiefs, sheriffs statewide, and federal partners to discuss emerging threats and public safety concerns throughout Dakota County, the metropolitan area, and Minnesota. I'll continue strengthening these partnerships, engaging our communities, and ensuring we're prepared for emerging threats. Accountability starts with leadership. Public trust is earned through integrity, transparency, and consistently delivering on our commitments.
Bobby Lambert:
I have over forty-five years of experience operating within and managing a team structure in law enforcement and athletics. Every team member plays a valuable role in the success of the team, but not all roles are equal. Successful teams are ones whose members accept their roles and strive to master them. I’ve spent most of my law enforcement career developing and empowering law enforcement professionals as a supervisor and training instructor. I know how to bring people together with different backgrounds, experiences, and skill sets. The secret to my success is honesty. Those I’ve had the pleasure to work with and train trust me and know my intentions are good.
Trust can be earned through transparency, accountability, and cooperation. Keeping people informed of important matters they should know, holding everyone accountable (including myself), and getting cooperation from all stakeholders through engagement are ways I’ll approach my office as sheriff.
EDIT ON 10-25-26 at 9:30 P.M.
Editor's note: The Hastings Journal received Nathan Ryan's responses to its six-question candidate questionnaire at 5 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 21, after the original voter guide had been prepared for publication. Ryan and incumbent Mike Slavik received the same questions and submission deadline.
In the interest of providing voters with information from both candidates, the Journal is publishing Ryan's complete responses as a late addition to the online voter guide. His answers appear as submitted, without editing for content, spelling or grammar.
The questions appear in the same order used in the published voter guide. In his answer to Question 5, Ryan refers to "question one" from the original questionnaire, which addressed data centers and appears here as Question 4.
Candidate: Nathan Ryan
No candidate biography was submitted.
How would you prioritize county road improvements and minimize the impact of construction on residents and businesses?
Nathan Ryan:
We need to ensure access to homes and business. Maybe by closing smaller stretches of roads and having construction companies held responsible for delays. To have a telecommunications company hold up the roundablout project is unacceptable. Two months to move lines is not meeting expectations.
How would you control county spending and property taxes while maintaining essential services?
Nathan Ryan:
We need a long term budget. And we have to follow it. It seems the county cannot follow a budget. We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spend and see problem.
What county services or issues affecting Hastings and District 1 would be your highest priority, and how would you address them?
Nathan Ryan:
Hyper Scale Data Centers would be my highest priority, we must have a moratorium and study the impacts. Road improvements along County Road 50 would be my second priority. In Hastings the impact of PFAS needs to be addressed. I would then look to work with the Hastings City Council for ideas on how and where the county can be helpful.
How should Dakota County approach data center development while balancing economic benefits, water and energy use, and impacts on surrounding communities?
Nathan Ryan:
We should enact a Hyper scale Data Center moratorium. The county should lead the way in research about these developments. The study should include: Impact on the aquafer and replacement rate, impacts on the waste water treatment facilitates, the water coming out of these industrial projects can be hot, also guidance on how close to existing residence homes. And the county should lead the way in defining Hyper scale data centers as heavy industrial use.
What role should Dakota County play in addressing PFAS contamination, protecting groundwater and supporting communities facing rising water treatment costs?
Nathan Ryan:
I believe I covered this in question one. We need to have concreate contracts and study issues before they occur. And in the case of PFAS, when we can find the source, we fine them. And those responsible, pay for all the clean up and reclamation.
How would you balance residential and commercial development with preserving farmland and the character of rural communities?
Nathan Ryan:
The population decline will start to slow expansion, we are already seeing impacts in elementary schools. We will be at a net negative population growth in 2030. Expansion will not occur past 2035. We need to prepare for less taxes and declining commercial developments and encourage companies to stay in Dakota County. We may need to use TIF to update commercial and industrial businesses.
